Saturday, April 5, 2014

Sharp VL-C73 camcorder cassette?




Tatum Addi


I recently received a fully functioning Sharp VL-C73 camcorder that my grandmother found in a yard sale. I've plugged it in, and it works and records perfectly--a lucky find. The only problem--no cassette! I am completely ignorant when it comes to 90's video technology, so does anyone know what type of cassette I need, and maybe where I could get one online? I would love to be able to record cool artsy b-roll shots with my new camera!


Answer
Sharp made mostly video8 camcorders. you can also use a Hi8 or Digital8 tape, they are all the same. i don't know how lucky you are, video8 is the lowest resolution camcorder system ever made and has marginal audio fidelity as well. until you put a tape in, you won't know that it records. while turning on and seeing a picture is a good sign, it does not tell if the recording heads are broken or clogged.

...8mm camcorder tape ...




mireflejom


are there any adapters for them? obviously they are too small to put into a vcr.. but do they sell adapters where you can insert them so that they can fit and work properly in a vcr ...?


Answer
no adaptors ever existed to allow video 8 playback in a VHS VCR. you are thinking of VHS-C. VHS-C is identical to VHS in all specifications except the cassette is made to hold less tape, and thus smaller. It can be adapted to play in a regular VCR.

video 8 is the wrong tape width, 8mm vs 12.5mm, the wrong coating formulation, metal vs oxide, the wrong linear speed, .57 ips vs 1.31 ips, and the wrong head speed, 12.5 fps vis 19 fps. no way compatible. however they did make VCRs that were video8 system instead of VHS. they are not very common and are more expensive that a camcorder.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Friday, April 4, 2014

What is the best durable video camera for sports under 500$?




Jason


I ski, play lacrosse, skateboard, and mountain bike. I already own a gopro and that is great for first person but I need something that someone else can use to film me. Price isn't really that much of an issue but i don't want to drop 1000 bucks on something that will likely get damaged while filming.


Answer
HD Camcorders, that being any Camcorder that does not use MiniDV tape for Video Storage and DSLR Cameras interpolate the video, which means of every 25 frames of video, 4 or 5 frames are taken by the lens assembly; the other frames in between these are filled in by the camcorder inner circuitry, thus giving you not true video. It looks like this -one frame from the lens assembly, 7or 8 from the electronic circuitry, one frame from the lens assembly, 7or 8 from the electronic circuitry, one frame from the lens assembly, 7or 8 from the electronic circuitry, one frame from the lens assembly, 7or 8 from the electronic circuitry, from front to back of the video. Near impossible to edit, even when you have the Multi port processor computer with the big 1GB Graphics card and a Sound card that is required to edit, view, watch and work with the files these camcorders produce.

DSLR Cameras, all Makes, all Models, all have the same problem when video taping some long videos, all overheat at the 13 to 18 minute mark, depending on the Make and Model. This is unavoidable, it all has to with the fact, video is an afterthought in DSLR camera production.

Consumer Level HD Camcorders and DSLR Cameras have 4 problems. 1) Blurry, fuzzy, out of focus areas closely around people in videos taken by consumer level HD camcorders. 2) Any movement, even a wave or lifting an arm, while in front of a recording Consumer Level HD Camcorder and DSLR Cameras, results in screen ghosts and artifacts being left on the video track, following the movement. Makes for bad video, sports videos are unwatchable. 3) These Consumer Level HD Camcorders and DSLR Cameras all have a habit of the transferred to computer files are something you need to convert, thus losing your HD quality, to work with your editing software. 4) Mandatory maximum record times - 1 hour, 30 minutes, 8 minutes, 3 minutes â four different times advertised as maximum record time for some Consumer Level HD Camcorders and DSLR Cameras. No event I have ever been to is that short. Either take multiple camcorders and DSLR Cameras or pack up with out getting the end of the event on video.

MiniDV is currently the most popular format for consumer digital camcorders. MiniDV camcorders are typically more affordable than their HDD and DVD counterparts. Each MiniDV tape will typically hold an hour of footage at normal recording speed and quality. MiniDV tapes are available for purchase at not only electronic and camera stores, but also at drugs stores and grocery stores, making them easy to find while your on vacation. There are literally hundreds of MiniDV camcorders available; both in standard and high-definition. And add the fact that to get a HD camcorder that could produce better video quality footage, one would have to spend in excess of $3500 for that camcorder that could produce higher quality video

http://simplevideoediting.com/learn/part1_camcorder_choices.htm

http://simplevideoediting.com/learn/part2_connect_camcorder.htm

http://usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/camcorders/consumer_camcorders/vixia_hv40#Overview

Buying advice on a sports video camera?




pyat77


I'd really love to have a nice, durable high quality, high frame-rate camera for filming sports-style activities.
BUT
I can only spend up to $500.

Suggestions?



Answer
I would consider Nikon D3000 10.2MP Digital SLR Camera
*10.2-megapixel DX-format imaging sensor for prints up to 20 x 30 inches
*Includes 3x 18-55mm Zoom-Nikkor VR Image Stabilization lens
*Nikon EXPEED image processing; in-camera image editing and Active D-Lighting
*3.0-inch color LCD screen; 170-degree wide-angle viewing




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Youtube video camera for best quality videos?




Stephanie


I am going to start making youtube videos and wanted to know what was the best video camera to invest in. I keep seeing that everyone is suggesting the flip video cameras, is that really a good video camera? I want the camera to be under $500. Im looking for best quality video camera. Thank you!


Answer
I suggest the Kodak PlaySport Zx3.

The Kodak Play Sport Zx3 is easy to use, has a very good display, and takes very good video in normal light and good video in low light. It's waterproof to a depth of 10 feet and can shoot good 5-megapixel stills. However, it only has fair audio quality. Its on-board software makes basic editing and sharing videos online very easy to do.

Highs
A good HD pocket camcorder with very good video picture quality, display quality and ease of use; good low-light picture quality, image stabilizer, versatility and still camera. Moderately priced model.

Lows
Fair audio quality and battery life.

You can click the link below for more information.

VistaQuest Sport VQ8950 Red 8MP Digital Camera, 2.7" LCD, Waterproof, Video Mode camera question!!!!!!!!!!!!?




Wolfers, C


ok, i know i already asked a question like this but i found a new camera, same brand, but it was about ten dollars more. it has 3 reveiws saying how it leaked, but 7 reveiws that rated it five stars and said it took good photos and worked properly. so, if you have ever owned this camera or know about it, does it take sound videos and is it worth the money? just wondering how good a camera it was, i want to be able to use it on vacation and in our pool. (its 5 feet deep) thanks!


Answer
In a word? JUNK!




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

camcorder shutter speed for low light conditions?




leatricema


There is a shutter speed given for video cameras in low light conditions. (1/30, 1/60, etc.) Is this the speed of the lens at all times or just when the lighting is low?


Answer
The camcorder's shutter speed is in fractions of a second and the amount of time the shutter remains open to allow light to hit the imaging chip (CCD or CMOS).

1/30 is typically the auto setting when in low light. Smaller number in the denominator means the shuttr stas open longer. Moving objects will record with ghost tailing and possibly blurred. 1/60-1/125 is in daylight. In auto shutter mode, as the lighting get brighter (or the aperture is opened), the shutter speed can increase. Most camcorders also allow you to manually set the shutter speed. At about 1/500-1/1000, the aperture can't open any more and the image will darken unless lots of light is added to the scene. Be careful, though, at this speed or faster, there is an irritating "strobe" effect that settles in and can be very uncomfortable for the viewer.

(Remember, still photos capture is different from video - with stills, typically, the goal is to freeze the moment so faster shutter speeds are more common. Which video, motion is fluid, so each frame does not need to have everything in sharp focus).

What is the best camcorder to get for low light recording?




fahhkinahh


I'm looking for a compact camcorder (nothing larger than a MiniDV camcorder) that records really good high definition video, even in situations where there is very low light. I'm not looking for something that can actually see stars in the sky (although that would be great) but I'm looking for something that offers the clearest picture.

Sound is also a major issue here. I was thinking about getting the Zoom Q3HD and using just that, but I was also thinking that maybe I'd be better off with using a much better camcorder and connecting the Zoom to the line-in port of the other camcorder (if possible) that way I have the perfect mix of great picture quality and great sound quality.

What do you think my best approach is? I'm looking for something that would be good with recording during concerts and situations where the volume can be very loud. Most cameras distort horribly. Do you think the Zoom Q3HD would be sufficient even for low-light situations? I think the majority of video quality is dedicated mostly to the audio and not so much the video, although 1080p is really good.



Answer
The "best camcorder" for good low light video capture is one with LARGE lenses and LARGE imaging chip system. There is no pocket cam or consumer cam that has these.

The large lenses let light in to get to the imaging chip, the imaging chip processes and digitizes the image. 60mm lens filter diameter and 1/4" 3CCD (or 3CMOS) imaging chip system would be minimums. The Sony HDR-FX7 meets these criteria, but will not do well in darkness (as opposed to "very low light"). The HDR-FX1000 will do better.

The lens diameter on the Zoom Q3HD is smaller than 30mm and the single imaging chip is smaller than 1/6". It is designed to do well with audio (manual audio gain control) - and video capture capability is a convenience feature for decent lighting conditions. Since you are looking for good concert capture, your approach on the audio is good - but generally, stage lighting is good so low-light behavior of the camcorder is not so important... in which case the Q3HD should be fine.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Thursday, April 3, 2014

Best Camcorder for my price range as of 6/9/2011?




sinfullsta


As of June 9, 2011, what is the best camcorder for around $300, give or take $50.

Keep in mind:
-No flip cameras please
-I am an amateur film maker
-I want to shoot music videos
-Shoot short films
-Even in the hands of the shakiest person, the film is still smooth, and clear.
-Able to shoot in very lowlight areas
-Please tell me if the camera you suggested has a mic input or not

I was looking at the Samsung HMX-H300, but give me your opinions on what you think the best camera that's bang for my buck. (as of today)
I forgot to add:
-If the camcorder has the ability to take pictures, it's a plus. (Not needed though)



Answer
Consumer level HD camcorders have 3 problems. 1) Blurry, fuzzy, out of focus areas closely around people in videos taken by consumer level HD camcorders. 2) Any movement, even a wave or lifting an arm, while in front of a recording consumer level HD camcorder, results in screen ghosts and artifacts being left on the video track, following the movement. Makes for bad video, sports videos are unwatchable. 3) Mandatory maximum record times - 1 hour, 30 minutes, 8 minutes, 3 minutes - all times advertised as maximum record time for some consumer level HD camcorders. No event I have ever been to is that short. Either take multiple camcorders or pack up with out getting the end of the event on video.

With a MiniDV tape camcorder, record 60 or 90 minutes ( camcorder settings), 90 seconds or less to change a tape and record for 60 or 90 more and repeat till you run out of tapes.

You can get a Canon ZR960 for $250. It is a MiniDV tape camcorder, has a Mic jack. You need a firewire (IEEE1394) card ($25 to 30) for the computer and a firewire cable (less than 10) to be able to transfer video to your computer. To say this is not HD, think about this. It would cost in excess of $3500 to get a HD camcorder that could equal the video Quality of a $250 Canon MiniDV tape camcorder.

What camera is best for photography as well as home pictures?




LeeLee


I'm 17, I don't mind spending 500 and under for a camera that will work like magic. I have a regular camera and i have managed to take some awesome photos with that but its actually wearing out sadly and I really need to upgrade,I love photography and I would love to start doing it more professionally as a hobby and as well as a job yet be able to take some awesome home pictures as well.I've heard that nikon and canon have the best cameras but i dont know which one's to even consider buying


Answer
First, no camera will "... work like magic." This saying should be committed to memory: "It isn't the camera its the photographer." Simply buying a DSLR of any brand is no guarantee that you'll suddenly begin taking "awesome" pictures every time you press the shutter release. Good photography requires knowledge of light, composition, exposure and Depth of Field (DOF) and the skill to use that knowledge to make the pictures you want to make.

Although the Pavlovian response in here is about 99% Nikon or Canon, there are other brands worth considering. Here are two - one within your price range and one that is over your price range but well worth considering.

1) The Pentax K-x. It was chosen by the Technical Image Press Association as their 2010 "Best DSLR Entry Level". Read this review: http://www.shutterbug.net/equipmentreviews/amateur_digital_slrs/0510pentax/index.html

The Pentax K-x has several features not found on comparably priced Nikon or Canon DSLR cameras.

A) A focusing motor in the camera body so any Pentax AF lens made since 1988 can be used and will auto focus as it should. The Nikon D3000, D3100 and D5000 all require use of AF-S lenses if you want auto focus. With Canon its a moot point since they started with AF lenses that had the focusing motor built-in.

B) Pentax has their version of Image Stabilization in the camera body so any lens used becomes, in effect, an IS lens. With Canon and Nikon you have to buy their lenses designated "IS" (Canon) or "VR" (Nikon) and not every lens they offer has this feature. Plus you pay for it over and over.

C) To expand your creativity the Pentax K-x allows double/multiple exposures. You can have from 2 to 9 exposures on a single frame with Auto EV Compensation. This is a feature few DSLRs have and the ones that do have it are several times more expensive than the K-x.

The Pentax K-x w/18-55mm zoom lens is shown at $499.00 at B&H w/free USA shipping.

2) The Sony A33. This DSLR and its "big brother" the A55 are currently the only DSLRs that allow full time auto focus whether you're shooting still pictures or video. This is made possible by Sony's Translucent Mirror Technology. Unlike conventional DSLRs the mirror in the A33/55 never moves. In place of the traditional optical viewfinder this requires an EVF (Electronic Viewfinder). You can actually view the scene even as the shutter is released. The Nikon D3100 allows continuous auto focus when taking videos but only then.

The Translucent Mirror also allows up to 7 frames per second shooting with the A33. Only professional-grade DSLRs costing 3 to 4 times more allow such rapid shooting. Combined with its full-time auto focusing capability the A33 should make shooting sports a snap.

The Sony DSLR line uses the legacy Minolta Maxxum "A" lens mount that was introduced in 1985. Like the Pentax K-x, the A33 has a focusing motor in the camera body so any "A" mount AF lens made since 1985 can be used on the A33 and will auto focus as it should.

The A33 also has Sony's version of Image Stabilization in the camera body so any lens used becomes, in effect, an IS lens.

Here are a couple of reviews:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA33/AA33A.HTM
http://www.alphamountworld.com/reviews/sony-alpha-a33-slt-review-alphamountworld

The Sony A33 w/18-55mm zoom lens is shown at $699.99 at B&H after a $50.00 Instant Savings from B&H. Offer ends 3-5-2011.

In comparison, the Nikon D3100 w/18-55mm zoom lens is shown at $579.00 at B&H after a $100.00 Instant Savings from B&H. Offer ends 2-26-2011.

B&H: http://www.bhphotovideo.com

Based on features and price there is no argument that the Pentax K-x offers the most bang for the buck.

Based on innovative technology the Sony A33 is cutting edge and certainly offers a lot for the price increase.

So open your mind and look at the alternatives before making a decision.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Advice on getting a camcorder?




Kayla


I was wondering if this camcorder http://cgi.ebay.com/NEW-Handheld-HD-1280x720p-Digital-Camcorder-12MP-Camera-/260751495576?pt=Camcorders_Professional_Video_Cameras&hash=item3cb6001198 is a good camcorder to take nice videos and if the sound quality is good.


Answer
You should buy this one camcorder

Sanyo VPC-CG20 High Definition Camcorder
* Full HD 1080, 60i Video (1920 x 1080)
*10MP Photos
*5x Optical Zoom (Photo and Video)
*2.7-inch Wide LCD Monitor for HD Playback
* Video and Photo Image Stabilizer

Best Consumer HD Camcorder?




LiveToRide


I'm looking to upgrade my now broken Casio Exilim EX-FH20 high speed camera which had 20x optical zoom

-Under $1,300 would be great (I don't want a professional camera!)

-It will be used to shoot equestrian sports so it must be good with action

-Video quality and the BEST ZOOM is what's very important to me

Any recommendations? I've been doing some research on multiple cameras by Canon, JVC, and Panasonic...is one brand better (or at least better in some areas)?
Or should I get another Casio EX-FH20?



Answer
Do you want HD camcorder or camera that can take video.If you want HD camcorder I would recommend Canon VIXIA HFS100 HD Flash Memory Camcorder
- Record crisp HD video directly to a removable SDHC memory card
- Genuine Canon 10x HD video lens; SuperRange Optical Image Stabilizer.It's the lens you need to record long shots of your child on the soccer field, wide shots of beautiful landscapes, and everything in-between. And because it comes with four zoom speeds, three pre-set and one variable, you always get smooth, steady, professional-looking zoom shots.
- 1920 x 1080 Full HD recording; 24p Cinema Mode, 30p Progressive Mode
- Built-in 8.0-megapixel digital camera delivers stunning quality photos
- HDMI terminal for easy, one-cable connectivity to your HDTV
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001OI2YZQ?ie=UTF8&tag=computer0bd-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B001OI2YZQ




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

How much would I need to spend to get the quality picture from a camcorder?




Fruit Scoo


I'd like to start filming and making money from my hobby. If you've had good or bad experiences, they are all welcome.

Thank you



Answer
Don't get a Camcorder for indie film making first off. For amateur video, get a DSLR camera. Camcorder are just a waste of money for you (unless you're willing to pay $5000+). I'll tell you why DSLRs are better.
1)Interchangeable lenses, you can change lenses for specific shots.
2)Huge Image sensor allows for much better quality and excellent low light performance.
3)Depth of Field, that's the out of focus effect you see in movies, very hard to do in consumer camcorders but DSLRs have full control.
4)Better support from the community, so many indie filmakers use DSLRs now and there are so many ways to get help because the community is very big.
5)Smaller and more compact than high-end camcorders
6)Doubles as an excellent still camera as well as video.
7)Cost, so much cheaper than a camcorder of equal features
Why some people are against DSLR and my rebuttal
1)Limited recording time, if you were a good cinematographer you would know shots don't usually take more than 30 seconds at most in movies.
2)Overheating, to overheat it you would have to continuously record for 10min+, not a problem for film. No one has 10min long shots
3)Bad ergonomics for video, get a rig
4)Bad audio, get a good mic and it'll be better than a camcorder's
5)Needs a lot of accessories to take good video, even with all of that added up it still costs less than a camcorder of equal video quality.

Any good camcorders?!?




heather


Looking into purchasing a video camera. Does anyone know how good the flip is? Or could recommend a good cam corder its just for family vacations and around the house I don't need a $5000 camera I'm not making a movie. Thank you


Answer
I use a Sony DCR-SR35E and it's a fantastic little camera. You can have the settings on auto or manually change the white balance and focus. Its records to a hard disk drive with plenty of memory i.e. I currently have a 2 week holiday, a charity walk, a trip to the farm and a birthday on it. Easy to transfer onto your computer with its own program. You can also save it straight to a DVD.

This camera has been with me from Christmas and birthday events to family holidays and once in a lifetime experience to the Pyramids. Oh, and it also has night vision. Happy camcorder hunting.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

£80 for pocket camcorder?




I_Like_Che


I need a pocket camcorder mainly for youtube so im hoping for one with good battery life and good video quality


Answer
Veho VCC-001 Kuzo HD Ultra Slim Pocket Camcorder Neat, compact and easy to use. This was an xmas gift for a teenage lad. I was looking for camcorder/camera the shape & size of a mobile phone which would be slim and convenient enough to pop inside a jacket or jeans pocket, this pocket camcorder is perfect.

What are some pocket camcorders worth checking out up to £200?




Anonymous_


I'm interested in getting a pocket camcorder for up to about £200 for doing guitar covers on Youtube. The Zoom Q3HD seems like a good choice for its awesome built in microphones, but I've heard it is rather cheap-feeling and doesn't record video as well as it should (though it seems to do it fairly well). So, is there anything at a similar price that records high quality sound, but with better video and build?


Answer
Although pocket camcorders are not the best quality I would say that if you are just staring off making videos for youtube they will fit the bill. For the price you can get started making some videos and see what tweaks you need to make. Once you become more familiar with making videos you can decide on whether a minDV or HD camcorder is right for you. Unfortunately many of the manufacturers are moving to tape less recording (if they haven't already) and most digital devices have quality that is just as good as tape. As far as a good pocket camcorder you want to look at the choices on this website. They are some of the best and most reliable devices on the market. You can get them at a really low price as well. If you decide to go with a full consumer or por camcorder in the future these models can be used for back up devices to capture extra angles.

http://www.video-editing-software-guide.com/pocket-camcorders.html




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

High fps camcorder?




Joel


I'm looking for a prosumer camcorder under 4k that can record at high frame rates for periods of at least 10 sec, without decreasing resolution. Any suggestions?


Answer
Red Scarlet. It's coming out in 2009, it's $3K and shoots in 3K resolution, which is higher than HD (Ultra High Definition). It's better than any Sony on the market and shoots up to 120fps in 3K. It can also shoot up to 180fps burst, which means it lasts for 5 seconds. That doesn't seem like much, but that's like 40 seconds of slow-mo. As implied, the Red Scarlet is the best camera under $15,000. It's only downside is that it'll require a powerful computer (Mac preferred) and a powerful editing system (Final Cut Studio preferred). It's worth it if you're up for the wait.
http://www.red.com/
Several other prosumer cameras shoot in 60fps, which can achieve excellent slow-mo in a 24fps project, but they are more expensive as Red, and not as good. The only one in your price range is the Canon XH-A1, which can shoot in 60i, but not 60p.

Which Camcorder would you recommend for this video clip?




Aristo P


http://www.vimeo.com/21294655

Please try this video clip! It's really SOMETHING..!
someday I wanna make some videos like this.. so i started looking for a decent camcorder
but i'm not really an expert so, please make some recommendations for me
FYI, I've never used camcorder and had no experience in filming or something..



Answer
Hi Yonghan, and welcome to Yahoo!Answers:

Since you are relatively new to video and camcorders, I won't "bog you down" with a bunch of technical talk, but basically the gentleman (Terje Sorgjerd) who shot the Aurora Borealis video used very high-quality Canon HD equipment and used "motion time-lapse" ("Motion TL") to allow for the long-exposures required to achieve the vivid colors and brightness of the final images.

Here's the equipment and lenses that were used:
Canon 5D Mark II camera
Canon 24mm/1.4 prime lens
Canon 16-35mm/2.8 zoom lens
Sigma 12-24mm zoom lens

Equipment was mounted on a computer-controlled DynamicPerception 6' "Stage Zero" robot-rail to achieve the motion tracking at the beginning of the clip.

You can also tell that he's an expert-level photographer/videographer, since he also has the video available in "4K" (which is super-High Definition video) format.

Knowledge of both equipment & optics, and excellent technique all contribute to a quality project like this one. Feel free to aspire to such a level, but do not be discouraged by your initial attempts! This video clip was not produced by a beginner.

hope this helps,
--Dennis C.
 




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What happens when a camcorder requires 7.9volts and you plug in a 7.5 volt adapter?




iscwest


Its a Panasonic PV-GS31 camcorder.


Answer
You need to know what AMPERAGE - milliamps the Camcorder is rated for at the 7.9 listed voltage. Adapters almost NEVER give the voltage that the label indicates - if you have a digital multimeter and look at the voltage, you will usually find that 7.9 volts actually reads 14 or 16 volts with no "load" ( not plugged in ) as the camcorder uses power the
voltage will drop, and the Amperage will increase - different
functions on the camcorder such as rewind, zoom, playback etc. will use different motors and chips, and therefore use different amounts of power. Some adapters use cheap
single diode converters from AC ( Alternating current input of 120 volts, which goes from zero to 167 vots in one direction, back to zero, then to 167 volts in the other direction, and back to Zero ) If there is little or no CAPACITOR value in MicroFarads, then the output is a choppy
jagged pulse. The Output rating of 7.9 volts at xxx milliamps ( one thousand milliamps is one amp ) is an AVERAGE only - at one specific amperage listed !
NOTE - you also need to know the center tip and outer
adapter plug poarity ( Positive and negative ) of the
replacement 7.5 volt adapter ! ! ! make certain that the
positive and negative match the required 7.9 volt inputs.
If you use a 3 AMP ( 3000 milliamp ) 7.5 volt adapter,
it may work much better than a 1100 milliamp 7.9 volt
adapter, since when the Camcorder uses a lot of power, the
7.9 volt may drop to 7.3 volts under heavy load, but the
7.5 volt ( "RATED" ) adapter may actually put out
9 raw volts, and NEVER drop below 7.5 volts with the
3000 milliamp ( "power output " ) it is capable of supplying. Unless I find a computer grade switch mode power supply rated a 5.0 volts, xxx amps, I rarely find any
adapter that actually puts out the VOLTAGE that is listed
on the label. Ten different adapters, by ten different
companies, all with the same output label ( 7.5 volts at
1000 milliamps ), will actually give 10 different voltages
at any given load ( Current draw in milliamps ).
Just make certain that the polarity ( Positive and negative ) is correct, and try the 7.5 - if the adapter gets too hot in a few minutes of use, then it is too small in its Amperage output, and you could burn it out. If it has an equal, or higher amperage than the original 7.9 adapter, and it remains cool running, and the camcorder works perfectly, then you are probably ok.
Summary - check the polarity and the amperage required. If your 7.5 volt adapter is labelled 200 or 450 milliamps then you are probably in trouble - the adapter is for a tiny device that uses little power. If the camcorder label states
1.6 amps ( at 7.9, or " 8 " volts ) then you are better off to try to find an adapter with similar or HIGHER amperage output, at, or near 7.5 to 8 volts, for example 2 amps ( 2000 milliamps ). If you had 2 electrical meters, one set to amperage, the other set to votlage, you could see the actual voltage of any adapter drop from, for example, 12 vots raw output, with no load, to 7.9 volts under heavy camcorder load when plugged in.
NOTE 120 Vots is not 120 volts of anything - it is an AVERAGE of the curve going up and down from zero to about 167 vots at the peak of each "hill" in the center. The wave form of 120 volts looks like a bunch of hills, alternating
with identical valleys, so the average "real" power is
about 120. If you look at an oscilloscope you see a sine wave, which looks like the side view of ripples in water.
If you had to say how high the water level was, and there were waves comming in on the beach, you take the average between the tops of the waves and the bottoms, and use that as an average. Similar to "120" volts, or 7.9 volts Direct current ( Direct Current is exactly the same a a battrey output - just a single voltage with no waves - just a straight line, like a water level on a day with no wind - flat ) Most adapters put out some form of ripple or waves caused by the 120 volt input's huge waves.
So, 7.5 and 7.9 "could" be almost identical, depending on
how well the adapters were made, and what electronics were used inside the adapters to change 120 volts down to " 7.9 ".
FINALLY, if I haven't bored you to death already, the CAMCORDER itself usually has a power regulation circuit
built into it as well ... This means that the Camcorder takes in the raw "7.9 volts" and has circuits to change the power to charge the camcorder's batteries ( high current, probably about 6 volts ), to run the motors ( probably
various tiny motors running 6 volts, 5 volts, 3 volts etc
depending on how powerful they need to be ), to run the memory and controller chips, (5.00 volts, 3.3 volts, 1.5 volts, etc. ) and to supply the mini liquid TV viewer screen's backlight... SO... This means that even a 9 volt
power supply with a correct polarity, and similar Amperage rating may work just fine, IFF the power converter circuits in the Camcorder itself can handle dropping a bit of excess voltage from the 9.0 volts ( rated, but putting out 12 vots raw power easily under no load ) to 8.0 ( or 7.9 ) volts rated by the Camcorder manufacturer. Again Amperage rating is a huge factor to consider...

Hope this helps

ROBIN

Which brand mini camcorder is tops for performance/value + very cost effective please?




TuityFruit





Answer
We bought this mini-camcorder for our daughter for Christmas...


http://www.target.com/Aiptek-P-HD-Camcorder/dp/B001G70RRW/sr=1-1/qid=1230548077/ref=sr_1_1/183-0280896-4005658?ie=UTF8&index=target&rh=k%3Aaiptek&page=1

We found it at Target for $120 and bought a 4GB flash card for another $25.

The user interface is a little odd at first, but once you figure out what the designers had in mind, it's pretty simple. It takes stills, varying qualities of video, it has night-vision mode, can be used as a voice recorder, and I think it has an MP3 player built in.

We havn't uploaded anything to the PC yet, so I don't know how that will all go down. It comes with a disk/program but I'm gonna let Windows Media and Picasa have first crack at it.

For the price, all seems well so far.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Suggestions for a Camera/Camcorder?




Kurt


I'm looking for a Camera/Camcorder, hopefully in the $400-500 (I can go up to $600-700) range suitable for a range of tasks...

I'd like it to be able to take good photos, as well as shoot 720p video of at least 60FPS. It'll mainly be used for video, so the video has to be high-quality.
It should have optical zoom.
It would be preferable if it had good sound to go with it.

It would be used for things such as:
-Indoor/Outdoor photography
-Filming people doing parkour/gymnastics/martial arts (basically, things with a lot of action)
-Shooting home-made moves/short films

I don't exactly know what direction I'm going. Can anybody suggest a camera (or if there's more than one that might work, some cameras) in my price range that might do what I need it to?
As I said, video is more important, so if it has to be strictly a camcorder or a camcorder that can't take nice pictures, that's fine too as long as it'd suit my other needs.



Answer
Camcorders with best video Quality in that price range are MiniDV tape camcorders. To get a HD camcorder that have as good or better Video Quality, would cost you in excess of $3300 to purchase that.

HD camcorders Interpolate the video, which means of every 25 frames of video, 4 or 5 frames are taken by the lens assembly, the other frames in between these are filled in by the camcorder inner circuitry, thus giving you not true video. HD camcorders interpolate the video, which means of every 25 frames of video, 4 or 5 frames are taken by the lens assembly; the other frames in between these are filled in by the camcorder inner circuitry, thus giving you not true video. It looks like this -one frame from the lens assembly, 7or 8 from the electronic circuitry, one frame from the lens assembly, 7or 8 from the electronic circuitry, one frame from the lens assembly, 7or 8 from the electronic circuitry, one frame from the lens assembly, 7or 8 from the electronic circuitry, from front to back of the video. Near impossible to edit, even when you have the Multi processor computer with the big Graphics and sound cards that is required to edit, view, watch and work with the files a HD camcorder produces.

http://www.canon.ca/inetCA/products?m=gp&pid=1017#_030

What camcorder would be best for shooting sports and streaming live on the internet?




pretzeladd


It would be used for capturing gymnastics. I would prefer not to get a camcorder that records to tape/disk (hard drive or memory card is okay). Any suggestions?


Answer
To get good video quality I would suggest get HD camcorder and if you want HDD Canon VIXIA HG20 is a good choice
- 24Mbps offers the highest bit rate in AVCHD for High Definition
video - enabling improved color reproduction and tonality
- Record up to 22 hours of High Definition video to a 60 GB Hard Disk Drive
- Includes a genuine Canon 12x High Definition video lens
- Comes with a 3.3 megapixel full HD CMOS sensor (1920 x 1080) and a DIGIC DV II image processor
It is easy to use and provide great video quality
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001DTTCQA?ie=UTF8&tag=computer0bd-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B001DTTCQA

or if you want more capacity Canon VIXIA HG21 AVCHD 120 GB HDD Camcorder with 12x Optical Zoom
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001DTXK8G?ie=UTF8&tag=computer0bd-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B001DTXK8G




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What is a good cheap Full HD 1080p Camcorder?




Matt R


I am an amateur film maker. I need a relatively inexpensive HD camera to film with. Any suggestions?


Answer
The Aiptek A-HD+ 1080P High Definition Camcorder is one cheap suggestion.

What is a Good Hd 1080P Video Camera for Under 300$?




Brandon


I have around 300$ and I want to find a nice Hd Video Camera that is 1080P focuses in on things and is an all out good camera for things like technical reviews and you know yeah please help!
I didn't ask for a message you simply copy and pasted. I asked for a camcord that is Hd 1080p and focuses in on stuff within my range of 300$ or less. Now I get what you are trying to say but you did not answer my question how I wish you would of



Answer
ANY camcorder can record good, high quality HD video under the following conditions:

1) The lighting is good. Less expensive camcorders have small lenses and small imaging chips. Under low light conditions, video capture quality will result in grainy video. Turn up the lighting and the video will look great.

2) The camera is steady. Humans were not built to be steady. Use a tripod, chair, rock... anything but not handheld.

3) Do not constantly pan or zoom. If you must, pan or zoom slowly and not a lot.

All the camcorders in the same price area from all the major manufacturers (Sony, Canon, Panasonic, JVC) will provide you approximately the same video quality. The difference is how you use the camcorder.

And that is one of the BIGGEST reasons why the "professionals" - with experience and skill - can provide "amazing" quality. They work within the capabilities of the equipment. They do not expect their equipment to do something it was not designed to do. Conversely, someone with no skill or training with the best and most expensive equipment available will still capture garbage.

So... pick a camcorder in your price range, learn it, use it within it's capabilities - and you'll be fine. Use the camcorder outside its capabilities - or expect it to do things it was not designed to do - and you will have problems.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Looking for DSLR for indoor ballet & outdoor sports?




icequeen_a


Trying to get a DSLR that can grow with my family. Need to get good photos for indoor/low light Ballet and also for football games/action shots. My current camera is starting to go, so I need something new. Not a pro but have an older Sony Digital, built-in lens, that I've been pushing and setting to get pretty good quality low-light no flash pics. I've been able to get only as high as 5 x 7 prints on those before it gets way too grainy. Takes good videos, too.

My father has a Nikon telephoto lens so I'm leaning towards Nikon, but frankly I need something sturdy that is somewhat weather proof, takes great action shots and won't kill my wallet. Want to stay below $800. TIA.



Answer
I would recommend the entry-level DSLRs.

Here are my personal favorites:

Canon t2i: 66.0 for image quality and up to 1080p for video (Full HD video - Movie like )
Canon T3: 62.0 for image quality and up to 720p for video (HD video)
Nikon d90: 73.0 for image quality and up to 720p for video (HD video)
Nikon d3200: 81.0 for image quality (Full HD video - Movie like )

You can find them at a decent price on eBay and it is international so no worries. Be sure to choose "Show lowest price first" so that you don't need to scroll down every page ! But I think that with the price you are willing to pay, it would be okay buying it new.

If you start to really like photography and want to continue to become a photographer, I would suggest upgrading to the Canon 7d or Canon 5d Mark II once you get hold of things and start making money.

Also check out this website : http://www.snapsort.com and write down the camera you want to see the whole review, comments, characteristics etc !

The camera body won't do everything though, you'll need to know how to use the camera and choose the right lenses. I think they are lenses made for sports and moving objects and such

whats the best camera for making you tube videos for a beginer you tuber?




huntnbigra





Answer
my recommendation is to use a camera with mini dv and if the budget stretches go for HDV.

here are some things to think about:

first, look at budget and then work out the best you can get for the money spent. try to steer clear of second hand units as they are usually more trouble than they're worth.

second, decide on a format to suit your style. most people are getting Hard drive cameras without thinking of the implications of the design. i will keep using mini dv tape myself until the bitter end as i think they are still the best format for low budget film making. you can use them in many HD cameras and will offer better archival storage and far superior image quality compared to DVD and HDD.

stick with mini dv - you can't miss. (btw mini dv only comes in 2 sizes - 60 min or 80 mins - it's true that you can set cam to shoot Long play and get 90 mins + on a tape but it's not worth it - always shoot SP)

third - what sort of shooting are you looking to do? indoor studio? or outdoor sporting events etc. many cameras are good for one but might be lacking for the other. try to find something that suits your needs and work out features you may find useful. eg - night vision sounds great but it's highly unlikely that you'll use it regularly. but if you found something with decent mic inputs and separate sound controls you may find that FAR more useful.

fourth - HDV is the next generation of camera. more and more people have HD tvs showing in widescreen and you can (in most cases) plug the cam in via HDMI straight into your HD tv and it looks AMAZING. SD or standard def is on the way out so you'll be stuck with a cam that you don't like the images for.

fifth - all cams are good for youtube. even a digital stills camera. most computers accept usb or firewire to upload images to an editing suite.

consider you applications, decide your format and look at how much you want to spend. make a short list then try them out.

the best brand of camcorder would technically speaking be "RED".

it is a 4k resultion cam capable of doing 35mm standard shooting. however, it would be very expensive and out of reach for most people.

however, cams come in many different varieties. there is SD and HD which is standard and high definition.

some have a single chip whereas onthers have three. others are widescreen and some are full screen.

many different factors make up what is best in the market. sony tend to make something that stands out in all market segments wether it be a simple point and shoot right up to the cam they used for star wars (the cinealta). of course the prices are hugely variable starting from around $200 going up to $200000 + depending on features.

the problem with these big expensive cameras is that many people are clueless how to use them. you may have a $10000 HD cam in the hands of a beginner and a pro cinematographer will wipe the floor with you using a bottom of the line point and shoot. they have many confusing dials and buttons designed to bring out the cameras best but it will take a while to learn how to use them effectively.

you can buy HD cams for around US$800 (give or take) which will produce great pictures and even do stills while you shoot. they are easy to use and can dramatically increase the quality of your movies.

many people ask 'what should i get? mini dvd, mini dv or Hard drive?'

i would say that the mini dv (although the oldest format of the bunch) is still the best. it offers excellent resolution (even in hd or HDV as it's known). it has great archiving value and is cheap to run.

dvd and hdd are useful in some ways but quite bad in others. sure, they may seem convienient but DVD has the WORST resolution and the discs are more expensive. HDD is better but what happens when you run out of drive space on a great trip away? and if it stuffs up - a new tape is far cheaper thana new hard drive.

so, to bring this long rambling point to a close, there are many ins and outs with cams so it s 'how long is a piece of string' question. have a look at what feels good to you and what looks good. think about what you are needing it for and consider the practicalities of each type.

i hope this advice helps.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Monday, March 31, 2014

A video-camera/camcorder under 500 dollars with best video quality possible?







I recently made a short film with my friends just using a digital camera that had a video capablities. Now i realized how much fun filming is and I want to do more. Now i just don't know what kind of video camera to get. I have a budget of up to 500 dollars and i want something that has really good quality(I know I might be asking for too much), has a large storage, and can be used with a tripod. I want to be able to edit my videos, but they won't be professional just for personal self-satisfaction. Really appreciate it.


Answer
Consumer level HD camcorders have 4 problems. 1) Blurry, fuzzy, out of focus areas closely around people in videos taken by consumer level HD camcorders. 2) Any movement, even a wave or lifting an arm, while in front of a recording consumer level HD camcorder, results in screen ghosts and artifacts being left on the video track, following the movement. Makes for bad video, sports videos are unwatchable. 3) These Consumer level HD camcorders all have a habit of the transferred to computer files are something you need to convert, thus losing your HD quality, to work with your editing software. 4) Mandatory maximum record times - 1 hour, 30 minutes, 8 minutes, 3 minutes â four different times advertised as maximum record time for some consumer level HD camcorders. No event I have ever been to is that short. Either take multiple camcorders or pack up with out getting the end of the event on video. Not to mention, but the computer you upload your HD files to has to have at least a 1 GB video card and a separate Audio card that can support Direct X® 9 technology. Your normal every day computer has massive troubles with HD video. Consumer level HD camcorders interpolate the video. This means they take one frame, make up the next 4 or 5 frames, take a frame and repeat this, over and over, for the remainder of the video, every video it takes is like this. With a MiniDV tape camcorder, record 60 or 90 minutes ( camcorder settings), 90 seconds or less to change a tape and record for 60 or 90 more and repeat till you run out of tapes.

You can get a Canon ZR960 for $250. It is a MiniDV tape camcorder, has a MIC jack. You will need a Firewire (IEEE1394) card ($25 to 30) for the computer and a Firewire cable (less than 10) to be able to transfer video to your computer. To say this is not HD, think about this. It would cost in excess of $3500 to get a HD camcorder that could equal the video Quality of a $250 Canon MiniDV tape camcorder.

http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/camcorders/consumer_camcorders/vixia_hv40#Overview

can you connect this camcorder to the tv ?




joseph k


I want to view the contents on my big screen television by just hooking up cables is that possible?


Answer
99.99% of all camcorders ever made can connect directly to a TV set. most have AV output (RCA connectors). a few have s-video and HDMI as well. Most TV sets, even the big screen ones, have AV input. however if the camcorder/TV both have HDMI, that would be the best.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Sunday, March 30, 2014

best camera to film live concerts, extreme sports, etc.?




xxxfalseid


as much information would help so much.


Answer
Try a camcorder. The equipment necessary for a DSLR to properly function in video mode, or achieve the results you see on YouTube/Television, would be much more expensive and bulky. A dedicated camcorder would prove more effective.

GOOD UNDERWATER CAMERA?




Sunny


I want to get an underwater camera that can get roughed up a lot, stand being in a car in freezing temperatures all night, be dropped, etc, and be ok. I don't do any extreme sports, but whenever i go diving or kayaking or bouldering when hiking or something my little kodak easy share isn't really ideal. I also really want to be able to take underwater photos. I really like using zoom so a good zoom feature would be nice, but i take a lot of distance photos too and video, so 10+ MP. Price should be around $150-200.

I was looking at the Pentax Optio W90 12.1 Mp waterproof, but I want to know all options before i choose this one. It says shock proof to 4 feet but i have accidentally thrown cameras before. And stepped on them...

Thanks!!!!



Answer
I would consider Pentax Optio W90 12.1 MP Waterproof Digital Camera with 5x Wide Angle Zoom and 2.7-Inch LCD (Pistachio Green)

Technical Details
Color: Pistachio Green | Size: One Size
12.1 megapixel CCD
720p high-definition video at 30 fps
Wide-angle 5x optical zoom (28?140mm equivalent)
2.7" LCD 16:9 display
Waterproof up to 20 ft

http://www.amazon.com/Pentax-W90-Waterproof-Pistachio-Green/dp/B0039237H4/?tag=%20huioe%20-20




Powered by Yahoo! Answers